Intel Corporation (INTC) Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Intel Corporation (INTC)

INTC 43.48

+8.6%

3:59 PM EST

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: Tony Viola who wrote (99922)	2/26/2000 9:24:00 AM
From: Process Boy	Read Replies (2) of 186894

Tony - <Either he or the Register is. Like to hear from PB, Paul, etc. on this one [Intel going fabless?]. Intel is not going to go fabless. Intel IS a Silicon house. Intel just bought a fab in Colorado, and has indicated it would be willing to buy other fab space in the near term. Not having the fab and design teams in conjunction when one is waging an MHz war would not be optimum. Witness the Coppermine. All the smart money indicated that the PPRO core could not be scaled past 850MHz or so. It is a combination of design and process optimizations that continue to allow the Coppermine to scale =>1GHz. For example, the bulk of this work was performed by respective process and design teams that report to the same Technology Director, and who's respective desks reside 1 floor apart. I, as Process Boy, could be at Design Boy's [or Girl's] desk in two minutes. There are many reasons why Intel would resist going fabless. The above is just one illustration. PB

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next