Better late than never. You are correct. It took awhile but the official line is that CYMI has not lost SVGL as a customer. Whatever that really means.<GGG>
AV
PS - to save time on another post, it appears that Canon might be horning in on SGVL's territory. And our reluctance to back SVGI at this juncture most certainly has been the correct decision. While we cannot really state which funds that could have been used specifically for SVGI and were diverted to more profitable ventures, during the timeframe of discussion with robgera, we have seen SCON, RMBS, CDTS, MIPS, NTAP, and a host of other stocks we opted for, skyrocket in value. Therefore, if and when the time comes to chase after SVGI, we will do it at higher prices but we will know the premium we will have to pay will pale in comparison to the profits made by utilizing the funds elsewhere. that is, of course, if doesn't fall below $20, where we would be extremely interested.
Andrew |
