OK, Stephen, I'll take it Real Slow-
<<I can't see how intent, even assuming that intent is defined by words instead of actions, is more important than capacity>>
It depends of the circumstances. I believe military analysts are uniform in their opinion that at the current time China is unable to pose a credible military threat to Taiwan. Hence, their current capabilities in that regard are not of paramount importance. However, China is engaged in a serious program of naval modernization, and their capabilities down the road may be quite different. That is why intent is, at this juncture, more important than capability. Clear now?
<<I am more inclined than some to take dictatorships at their word when they announce their intent.
In other words, you seem to feel that words speak louder than actions. The only reason I can see for this is that the words support your opinion and the actions don't.>>
Stop with the idiotic paraphrasing, would you Stephen? In no way did I indicate that "words speak louder than actions" and conclusions like that only make you look stupid. The point is, China has issued a formal policy statement the words of which are threatening and an appropriate reaction is called for. As my previous posts have indicated, it is important that the dictators in Beijing understand well American intent regarding the security of Taiwan. Many wars have resulted by mis-judging the opponent's intent.
Larry |
