Page One Feature
Star Rescue Team Gets Tarnished By Taking On Waste Management
By JEFF BAILEY Staff Reporter of THE WALL STREET JOURNAL
There is a certain glamour to corporate rescue work, to swooping in after disaster strikes, pushing aside the bumblers and, with the dispassionate logic of an outsider, setting things right.
But, as three board members at Waste Management Inc. are finding, there is no glamour the second time around. As newcomers in 1998, the three thought they had fixed the giant trash hauler. They scrubbed its books and merged it into a scrappy competitor with well-regarded management. The stock soared.
Then, this past July, profits fell short of expectations. The stock plunged. The merger, it turned out, was in disarray. The company's books were again a shambles. And top management had to be thrown out. The three board members stepped in again to run things. This time, it was their mess. And they have been struggling to salvage not just a troubled company, but their own reputations.
"We're all embarrassed," says Robert S. "Steve" Miller, whose work at Chrysler Corp. and many high-profile basket cases over two decades has made him one of corporate America's more celebrated Mr. Fix-Its. Adds Roderick M. Hills, a former Securities and Exchange Commission chairman who heads Waste Management's audit committee: "I'm not proud of the fact that, in retrospect, we didn't know what the hell was going on."
This is the humbling account of a high-profile rescue team's second tour of duty, not yet finished, at Waste Management: the sensitive matter of succession when the chief executive officer is desperately ill; the surprise delivery of a $40 million corporate jet that they didn't know had been ordered; dubious insider stock sales; the indignity of enduring a lengthy I-told-you-so from the company founder, who opposed the merger -- and who now has sued Messrs. Miller and Hills, blaming them for ruining his creation.
The job has been complicated by the three directors' conflicting personalities. Mr. Miller is too easygoing, his cohorts say. Mr. Hills is so tough at times that the others wince. And the third, shareholder activist Ralph V. Whitworth, has had to become a boss instead of a critic. Surprised last July to find himself acting chairman at a company with 68,000 employees, the 44-year-old Mr. Whitworth declared: "I'm the dog that caught the car."
Mr. Whitworth has spent so much time at company headquarters in Houston that his wife, Wendy Walker Whitworth, producer of the "Larry King Live" TV show, recently greeted him on the doorstep of their Rancho Santa Fe, Calif., home with this comment: "I figured this was the only way I would get your attention." She was wearing a black garbage bag, holes for head and arms, her blond hair adorned with red twist ties.
For nearly a decade, people in the garbage business have contended that a smartly run company could defy some basic industrywide problems. A glut of dump capacity that emerged around 1990 depresses disposal prices. And garbage piles up only as fast as the economy moves, so it isn't much of a growth business. Still, the industry has managed to obscure these facts with an unending acquisition binge. The Waste Management directors would be well into their second tour of emergency duty before they fully understood this fact.
Indeed, an acquisition had been the centerpiece of their first run at saving the company. Mr. Miller had stepped in as Waste Management's interim CEO in 1997 at a time when the company was under siege. Massive accounting problems that had overstated profits for years were bubbling to the surface, hammering the company's stock.
An intensive audit overseen for the board by Mr. Hills, who had been named a director in late 1997, led to a $3.54 billion pretax charge in February 1998. Shortly thereafter, USA Waste Services Inc., a smaller but fast-growing trash hauler whose CEO, John E. Drury, was a garbage man's son, agreed to buy Waste Management for $13.43 billion. Mr. Drury had once been the No. 2 executive at Waste Management's archrival, Browning-Ferris Industries Inc.; he had been fired in 1990, but had re-emerged as a trash-industry star at USA Waste. And Mr. Drury's top outside adviser on the deal was Mr. Whitworth, whose firm, Relational Investors LLC, specializes in cajoling managements into painful restructurings.
When the merger was announced, Mr. Miller lauded USA Waste for having "the ideal senior management team." Wall Street was enthusiastic. The only notable opposition came from Dean L. Buntrock, Waste Management's founder and former longtime CEO. He wrote a letter trying to dissuade directors from the deal. He argued that USA Waste's various businesses were weak, that its computer system wasn't powerful enough for the merged company, and that Mr. Drury wasn't qualified to run the combined operations. He pleaded with the board to find its own CEO.
But since many of the accounting and other problems that got Waste Management into trouble in the first place occurred on Mr. Buntrock's watch, he had little credibility with his company's board. It approved the merger. The new company adopted the Waste Management name and made Houston, where USA Waste was based, its headquarters. Mr. Miller was to be chairman for one year. Mr. Hills stayed on as audit-committee chief. And Mr. Whitworth joined the board as head of the corporate-governance committee.
The heavy lifting was over, or so the three directors thought.
They hadn't attended the USA Waste board meeting on July 15, 1998, the day before the deal closed. Investors had bid up the company's stock about 40% since the merger was announced, boosting the deal's value to $19.13 billion.
Soon after the announcement, USA Waste had ordered a Gulfstream IV corporate jet for Mr. Drury at a cost of about $30 million. But at the board meeting, Richard J. Heckmann, a USA Waste director and an airplane enthusiast, took note of Waste Management's substantial international operations and suggested that a Gulfstream V, with its longer range, might now be in order. "It's the only way you're going to go nonstop" from Houston to London, Mr. Heckmann explains in an interview. G-Vs, as they are known, sell for about $40 million.
There was the matter of the G-IV and the $2 million nonrefundable deposit USA Waste had already made on it. But another USA Waste director, Kosti Shirvanian, had watched the value of his holdings in the company rise to nearly $500 million, up from about $175 million in 1996. "I made a motion to buy a G-V," Mr. Shirvanian recalls. Why? "Because I wanted the G-IV." He bought it for his personal use, and USA Waste ordered a G-V.
Jerome B. York, another USA Waste director who is often a stickler on discretionary expenses, was disgusted, and got up and left the room.
During his years at USA Waste, Mr. Drury had won over Wall Street by seeming to manage a series of ever-larger acquisitions without a hiccup. And in the weeks after the Waste Management deal, he said the combined company would meet its cost-cutting target of $800 million.
But two factors soon emerged that might have prompted Waste Management's board to keep a closer eye on management. In November 1998, Mr. Drury was diagnosed with a brain tumor. After surgery to remove it and facing a month of radiation treatments, he nevertheless said he would "resume normal activities" in a week.
His doctors' assessments reassured the directors. And they felt they had a first-rate successor, if needed, in president and chief operating officer, Rodney R. Proto. At a March 1999 board meeting in Phoenix, the CEO was "noticeably weaker -- didn't have the cogency," Mr. Whitworth recalls. There were complications in Mr. Drury's condition.
The second factor, Mr. Whitworth says, was that Messrs. Drury and Proto "were arrogant. They really treated the board, and Steve, shoddily." Shortly after the merger, Mr. Whitworth suggested that Mr. Drury prepare brief monthly updates for the board on the company's progress. According to Mr. Whitworth, Mr. Drury, the CEO, responded: "Bull. I don't write memos. They either want a lean operation or a bureaucracy." At other times, Mr. Whitworth says, Mr. Drury belittled Mr. Miller behind his back. "Steve Miller was the chairman, and they ignored him," says Mr. Hills.
Mr. Drury, 55, is too ill to be interviewed, says his lawyer, Bill Porter. Mr. Porter says he isn't familiar enough with events at Waste Management to speak for Mr. Drury, but adds: "I'm quite confident that John Drury was a dedicated, hardworking, ethical executive who worked in the interest of stockholders. I've seen nothing to lead me to believe otherwise."
Mr. Miller says he wasn't personally offended by the way he was treated. The 58-year-old executive, who lives in Oregon and had originally planned on a year as chairman, decided to step aside early for Mr. Drury, and did so at the company's annual meeting in May 1999. Given Mr. Drury's health, many of the directors weren't very happy about that, Mr. Whitworth says. But it was a done deal.
At the time of the annual meeting, many board members hadn't seen Mr. Drury in two months. Mr. Proto increasingly was handling day-to-day operations. Mr. Drury attended the meeting in a wheelchair. "And he looked terrible," one director remembers. The CEO spoke briefly to shareholders about his health. Afterward, during a photo opportunity, he had trouble standing to receive the chairman's gavel from Mr. Miller.
Mr. Miller says he felt uneasy. "But I'd already handed him the gavel," he recalls. In hindsight, Mr. Miller mocks his own passivity: "Proto's our successor. Shrug shoulders. Back to Oregon."
Missed Opportunity
Mr. Hills says he was "shocked" when he saw Mr. Drury. "That's when we should've taken a more aggressive stance," he says. By then, Mr. Hills, 68, was wrestling with Mr. Drury's management team over control of a mountain of shareholder lawsuits and an SEC investigation left over from past Waste Management accounting problems. Mr. Hills took a harder line in dealing with executives of the old Waste Management than the Drury-Proto team and some directors thought necessary, and he was beginning to have doubts about some of the new company's executives.
Mr. Heckmann, the director, who is chairman of U.S. Filter Corp., says he supported the Drury-Proto team at the time. "We were from the USA Waste side," he says. Looking back, he adds, Mr. Hills "was right. He wasn't getting the right answers. Then he started to burrow in. He p----- everyone off."
In the months since then, Mr. Hills has come to conclude that the Drury-Proto team badly overpaid for some acquisitions before and after the USA Waste-Waste Management merger. At the time, however, Wall Street analysts were still upbeat about the stock, and in mid-June 1999, Mr. Proto, according to Mr. Miller, informed the board in a letter that it appeared the company would meet its earnings forecast for the second quarter.
But late on July 6, 1999, the company warned that second-quarter results would fall short of expectations. More ominously, it conceded that it wasn't sure why. Its stock plunged 37% the following day.
If the second quarter was so weak, how had Waste Management come within a penny a share of estimates for the first quarter, typically a weaker period? For the board, what had been a string of unrelated concerns and annoyances was fast coming together to shatter its trust in management.
Mr. Whitworth flew to Houston and grilled Mr. Proto and the company's chief financial officer, Earl D. DeFrates. Had they dressed up the first-quarter earnings with any undisclosed one-time gains? "It sure looked like it to me," Mr. Whitworth says. "But they said no." Mr. DeFrates couldn't be reached for comment; he was fired by the company in July.
Insider Selling
If the first-quarter earnings had included undisclosed gains, some heavy insider selling of Waste Management stock in the weeks before the disastrous second-quarter announcement was going to look very bad. Mr. Proto had sold 300,000 shares for about $16.5 million. A dozen other insiders reported selling, too. Mr. Whitworth says he began asking executives he encountered in the men's room whether they had sold shares. "The first 10 people I asked, I was batting one thousand," he says. "That was disturbing."
The board, increasingly concerned, named Mr. Whitworth interim chairman. Mr. Whitworth says one of his first steps was to order Mr. Proto along for a visit to some field operations. "We were flying from Pittsburgh to Atlanta and I said, 'Rod, when was the last time you did this?' He said August of 1998. This was July of 1999. The most operations-intensive period of the company. Pittsburgh is the biggest division. He had been to Hong Kong, to Italy, to New Zealand, to Australia, to Latin America twice," in the meantime, Mr. Whitworth says. "That's when the whole lore of 'the best operator in the industry' just went out the window."
Mr. Whitworth also kept badgering the financial people about his suspicions about the first-quarter results. Finally, he says, the company's chief accounting officer, Bruce Snyder, "started belching out everything." (Mr. Snyder won't comment.) Says Mr. Whitworth: "I started calling the board members and saying, 'Look, I don't think Proto survives.' "
The first-quarter results had included a bunch of undisclosed one-time items and would have to be restated. Now, the insider stock sales definitely looked bad.
Mr. Proto didn't return phone calls. His lawyer, Gary Lynch of New York, says, "Rod Proto wouldn't have sold the stock if he thought he had material nonpublic information." Mr. Lynch wouldn't elaborate.
At an Aug. 13 meeting, the board decided that the ailing Mr. Drury, too, had to step aside. "It was the toughest assignment of my business career," Mr. Whitworth says. Mr. Whitworth went to the hotel where Mr. Drury and his wife, Tanya, were living to deliver the word. "His wife got very upset," Mr. Whitworth recalls. "She had to leave the room."
Mr. Whitworth says Mr. Drury told him: " 'I knew this was coming. She just sees it as her personal failure because she was trying to get me better.' "
Later, back at the office, Mr. Whitworth and Mr. Miller, who had returned from Oregon to serve as acting CEO for the second time, went to fire Mr. Proto. Mr. Whitworth did the dirty work. Mr. Miller mostly gazed out the window. Shortly afterward, Mr. Whitworth recalls, one of the company's finance officials walked up to him and said: " 'By the way, we're taking delivery of a G-V. We need to make a final payment.' "
Astonished, Messrs. Whitworth and Miller went to the company hangar to see for themselves. They were pleasantly surprised to find that the new jet wasn't plastered with corporate logos; the company was able to sell it at a slight profit, Mr. Whitworth says.
Mr. Miller moved into Mr. Drury's office. On the computer terminal, he says, he found no e-mail and no business information. "Jeepers. If I was CEO, I'd want tonnage reports," Mr. Miller says. Waste Management had them, but on paper.
What Mr. Miller and his colleagues were slow to grasp was that tonnage reports had become far less important to many trash executives than stock-price quotes. Since the early 1970s, the formula at publicly traded garbage companies has been to use stock to buy up smaller, privately held haulers. Add profits. Boost the stock. Fund more deals.
Actually integrating the operations and running the company efficiently became a secondary consideration. Industry consolidation pushed up acquisition prices, making it ever harder to boost profits through deals, without using some aggressive accounting. At some point, nearly all of the big players stretched too far to do deals, then ran into earnings shortfalls or other problems that savaged their stocks. And the pioneers of the practice, including Mr. Drury, Mr. Buntrock and Mr. Shirvanian, proved not much better at figuring out when to run for cover than the average investor.
Mr. Shirvanian, the USA Waste director who bought the G-IV, built a California waste empire from scratch that he later sold to USA Waste. But he hung on to his shares in the new Waste Management. Once valued at $500 million, they have since plunged by about 75%. (Waste Management's woes have carved $27 billion from its market capitalization since May 1999.) Mr. Shirvanian's G-IV was finally delivered a few weeks ago. "Financially, I don't know if I can afford it," he says. "I'm looking for a partner."
Mr. Buntrock, too, despite his warnings about the merger, kept about a third of his two million shares. In August, Mr. Buntrock, 68, flew down to Houston in August to have breakfast with Messrs. Whitworth and Miller. "A lot of it was to tell Miller, 'I told you so,' " Mr. Whitworth says. To their surprise, Mr. Buntrock urged the two executives to rehire much of the old Waste Management executive team that had been purged.
Daily Meetings
No thanks, they told him. In mid-August, Mr. Whitworth began holding daily meetings to try to sort out the books. Each Waste Management operating location, a hauling yard or a dump, has its own controller. Mr. Whitworth asked how many controllers there were. First he was told between 350 and 400. A few days later, it was 500. Ultimately, 600.
He asked the controllers how long it would take to bring their books up to date. Some said as many as 400 hours.
That's when Waste Management decided to bring in 1,160 outside auditors from Arthur Andersen LLP and from the company's internal audit contractor, PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP. To avoid having rookies assigned to the case, Mr. Whitworth says he made both firms "give me the name, experience level and qualifications of everyone they assigned."
But with business booming, where were the firms going to find 1,160 available auditors? The 43rd floor of the office building housing Waste Management was turned into a giant bullpen for consultants and contractors. One day, Mr. Whitworth rode the elevator up to 43 and, he says, spotted a sign: "Arthur Andersen New Hires." And "it showed an arrow," he recalls. "They were out on the street hiring people and sending them to Waste Management." The tab for the 1,160 workers was about $3 million a day, Mr. Hills says.
An Arthur Andersen spokesman, Matt Gonring, says fewer than 100 of the 550 people the firm assigned to the job were new hires. He says the sign read: "New People This Way." PricewaterhouseCoopers says it hasn't received any complaints from Waste Management.
As the numbers came in -- $211 million in uncollectible bills; $305 million in unrecorded expenses; $226 million for "hundreds of little things," Mr. Whitworth says -- the charge the company would eventually take in its third quarter for accounting irregularities and other problems rose to $1.76 billion, pretax.
It was time to hire another full-time CEO. The job wasn't getting any more attractive. One candidate, David Cote, then head of General Electric Co.'s appliance unit, wanted assurances he could move the company out of Houston. So Messrs. Whitworth and Miller offered the job to the other contender, A. Maurice Myers, CEO of trucking company Yellow Corp. Perhaps he could make the trash trucks run on time.
The three directors think they have Waste Management in the right hands now, although Wall Street, burned so badly the last time it heard that, remains wary. Monday, the company's shares fell 25 cents to $15 in 4 p.m. New York Stock Exchange composite trading. Mr. Hills has added a new mountain of litigation, and a related SEC investigation, to the stuff he was already handling. One new lawsuit is Mr. Buntrock's: On Feb. 22, he sued the company, Mr. Hills and Mr. Miller. He blamed the two directors for mismanaging the company and demanded about $12 million he says he is owed in pension money.
Mr. Whitworth is busy trying to sell Waste Management's international operations and some other assets. He is hoping people remember that the three directors didn't run from trouble. As for Mr. Miller, though he is still consulted at times by the others, he has taken another corporate fix-it job with Reliance Group Holdings. He arrived at the New York insurer after trouble hit, so he says he has no emotional investment there.
"That I regard as my great strength," Mr. Miller says. "The distinguishing characteristic of Waste Management is that I believed in it and promoted it." |