SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Non-Tech : Amati investors
AMTX 1.380+0.4%Dec 24 12:59 PM EST
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Will C. who wrote (15779)4/30/1997 2:09:00 PM
From: j rector   of 31386
 
[Will C]

Now you're not providing the entire picture. I am definitely
on the fence regarding the CAP vs DMT debate, but I think you
are wrong on this one. RADSL CAP is not cheaper or lower in
power consumption than DMT. The old CAP is, but to compete w/DMT
RADSL CAP had to up its power consupmtion. Actually DMT versus
RADSL CAP is an interesting comparison. In theory, DMT should
win hands down in terms of efficiency.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  

HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News