|
When you really want to be heard, say it on SI, huh Tom? <g> So let me see if I got this right. Chuck and Jim want Gordon to sit down and write them a letter. Gordon is flying around the country like a mad man, negotiating deals, arranging financing, doing the work of three people--but he should stop doing those unimportant functions and sit down to write Chuck and Jim a letter. Jim doesn't think Gordon has the shareholders in mind. Man, what else can he do? He works 16 hours a day at times, on weekends and holidays, and the news is coming out steadily. He communicated to the stockholders (and potential stockholders) via the otc/internet interview. There is an IR man at the company fielding questions. A stockholders meeting is scheduled. But this is not enough. Chuck and Jim want a newsletter. This is handholding, people! This is a luxury this company which is operating on a skeleton staff can ill afford. Don't write me a newsletter. Don't spend time updating the web site telling me what time everybody went to the bathroom this afternoon. Rather spend time getting this stock out this OTC hell-hole! Spend your time arranging the financing, the new deals, the new products! I don't need investment handholding, and those who do, sell today...........<<this announcement couldn't have come at a worse time. The stock was spring loaded for a big announcement that would have taken it past a dollar and a half.>> That statement is typical of the long-term view OTC:BB investors take of every issue. Chuck and Jim wanted their pop so they could sell and move on to the many other "top-drawer" BB stocks. Which is more important: arrange financing for the company and qualify for the NASDAQ or give the short-term thinkers their pop? I have been critical of Robert Gordon at times but you guys make him look brilliant, profound, and visionary. Regards, Suzanne |
