?>[constructive] criticism of management...
With all due respect we are simply identifying the possibility that this management team perhaps lacks the critical mass to correctly identify shareholder value, are visionaries, viz a viz lost opportunity costs/shareholder value destroyed re: missing the entire XML shareholder value opportunity, Kurzweil/Lernout Hauspie failed negotiations/adverse ruling/NASDAQ Delisting, failed/missed shareholder value optimized negotiations with LEAF re: Panorama XML divestiture (i.e. LEAF shares for SWEBF business unit(s)), etc. The NASDAQ:SWEBF nka OTC BB:NKCIF Rabins/Schneider-led BOD have simply failed to maximize shareholder value to date and it is increasingly manifesting itself that former failed NKCIF strategic alliances/business units ref/ SoftQuad XML sq.com , LEAF, LHSP, the XML industry itself et al are and have established significant shareholder value, LEAF, for example, in the range of 15,000X in the last 15 months?...Is this a pattern with this management team would appear to be a reasonable non-insider shareholder concern.
We are again simply pointing this out for existing and potential shareholders the issues of facts, of which, should not be falling on deaf ears. What we are equally concerned about is that NKCIFs story, however, does appear to [continue to] be falling on deaf ears with The Street.
AS A MATTER OF RECORD esecurities.com is also long NKCIF and perhaps, beneficially-owned, one of their largest non-insider shareholders.
Respectfully,
/s/esecurities.com corporation |
