Anthony, what you have done is one of the hardest things to do. Most people would shy away from even speaking about it at all. They would do everything not to acknowlege it. They would do whatever they could to make up reasons other than explain what was going on.
Admitting that you suffered from depression publically is still a taboo, in a society that dwells in surface level depths and constrained by sheepish political correctness. People can get themselves in a tizzy and say "see see" about your legal matter, but most of them live in unexamined lives, existing deep within the herd.
What strikes me most about this matter is the time period involved, and some of the circumstances that are known on the public record.
Why in America, does a case that boils down to IMO....you making bonehead mistakes related to a medical conditon... take full 6 years to bring up? Talk about a high profile "gotcha" on miniscul substance.
It is also my understanding that both the Judge and Procecutor either resigned because of acknowleged bias or gross conduct. It was also reported that legal experts believed this to be a civil matter between a private insurer and you. I am no expert in this particular case I just understand what I have read....nevertheless it smells like you have been singled out intentionally.
It bothers me that government resources are being utilized not for the general well-being of the comunity but instead to muck-rake 6 years into past event.
I read thestreet.com's article and was in awe of the complete absurdity of the connection that Beth Kwon attempted to draw. Here was Beth's argument paraphrased IMO:
"Since Anthony was struggling with personal difficulties as a young man, that are now in courts after 6 years, can his investment opinions be worthwhile now?"
A trully pathetic argument, there is no relationship between the comparison being offered. At no point does Beth establish why the reader should be concerned.
What Beth Kwon offer.....quoting her article: "Sure, a disability dispute doesn't have much to do with stock trading. But it's at least embarrassing for someone who champions the cause of investors in digging up frauds to be himself accused of mail fraud."
There is, the muck has been raked and now thrown!
Beth's arguement will be the same as others that will rant here on SI. NOTHING TO DO WITH SECURITES, BUT EMBARASSING.
In Asia there is a saying, "The nail that sticks out, gets hammered in".
But Helen Keller said this,
"Security is mostly a superstition.
It does not exit in nature....
life is either a daring adventure
or nothing"
Cheers to you Tony,
wolff
PS: yah long winded I know, but its better than watching informercials when you ain't been sleeping right.
PSS any gramatical and spelling errors were left in intentionally |
