SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Intel Strategy for Achieving Wealth and Off Topic
INTC 45.07-17.0%Jan 23 9:30 AM EST

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Sonny McWilliams who wrote (25559)3/3/2000 2:49:00 PM
From: Gerald Walls  Read Replies (4) of 27012
 
Gore has to keep up with things. Bush said last night he was not opposed to Gun safety locks. He was just wondering how you enforce it.

I just heard that hypocrite Clinton on the radio using that poor girl's death to advance his agenda. This is an example of how much more cruel liberals can be than those mean-spirited conservatives. Either Clinton's a cynical, manipulative bastard or he's stupid enough to think that a drug dealer's going to keep a child safety lock on a stolen handgun.

He said a better way would be the technology that only the gun owner could fire the gun.

Too bad if your wife needs to use the gun or if you need it to defend yourself and the battery's dead. It would somewhat boost the price of stolen handguns because they'd need to go through someone who'd disable the device or reprogram it like they do when they clone cell phones. But, since a properly-maintained firearm takes a long time to wear out, the only way that even this effect would occur in our lifetimes is if they confiscated all the "archaic" firearms that we use today.

Thanks for letting me know that Bush supports gun control. I missed that part of the debate.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext