SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Ask Michael Burke

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Skeeter Bug who wrote (77035)3/6/2000 10:43:00 AM
From: BGR  Read Replies (3) of 132070
 
SB,

Apples and oranges. I am looking at the long term, you the short. After early seventies and late 80's the US stock market came roaring back within a few years. It is not money, it is the underlying soci-economic and business structure that matters. I like the US environment in this regard. I must confess that I am biased, as I work here, and enjoy working here. So, no, I am not betting against history in any way. In fact, if the internet revolution turns out to be of similar scale as the telephone-and-automobile revolution, I have history solidly on my side. The Great Depression was largely an issue of faulty Central Bank policy which decided to drain liquidity at the wrong moment (under public pressure). It seems to me that Greenspan knows better. So, overall, the odds look good to me over the next 34 years (my investing horrizon).

BTW, go easy on tulips. That has been used to death over the past 5 years by novice business writers.

Finally, any two charts with similar long term trends tend to be highly correlated. Means nothing as far as future prediction goes. The chart readers have been proven wrong repeatedly. Ultimately, it's the fundamentals, my friend!

-BGR.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext