Intel Corporation (INTC) Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Intel Corporation (INTC)

INTC 35.53

-1.1%

Nov 14 9:30 AM EST

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: nihil who wrote (100428)	3/7/2000 7:06:00 AM
From: jackrabbit	Read Replies (1) of 186894

Re: It seems obvious that if Intel stuck to the mp business almost exclusively that its revenue growth (with falling prices) and EPS would increase at about 8 per cent a year. . . . Without new rapidly growing businesses, such as Barrett is exploring (after Grove deneglected segment zero and the network) Intel is dead meat, and the stock would collapse. Nihil -- Over what time frame do you see this happening? Why should anyone own Intel if the stock price is dependent on the success of new business ventures? IABG is the only profitable segment for Intel and the investments in the startups are drags on the bottom line. Do you think Intel can be #1 or #2 in many or any of the new business areas? I was surprised by Barrett's cavalier, and seemingly derisive, attitude toward Intel's CPU business, especially considering the recent execution problems. For Intel to continue to succeed, he must defend the CPU castle before venturing off to take new territory. Regards, John

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next