SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : MDA - Market Direction Analysis
SPY 687.85-0.4%Dec 29 4:00 PM EST

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Jerry Olson who wrote (42507)3/7/2000 11:12:00 PM
From: Dwight E. Karlsen  Read Replies (2) of 99985
 
i've been saying all along..smokestack stocks...are stodgy and can't make the profits the techs can...

as we slow they will get killed...

------
The profits that techs can...uh huh. Like AMZN, you mean? Or the fact that the majority of Nasdaq stocks are money-losing companies?

And how about your WAVX?

For the nine months ended 9/30/99, revenues rose 47% to $70 thousand. [Hey, wow! a cool $70 thou!] Net loss applicable to Common rose 74% to $18.9 million. Higher loss reflects an increase in personnel, consultants, trade shows, equipment and other related costs and a $1.5 million acquisition cost.

Now let's look at P&G: "Per-share growth for the full fiscal year is expected to be about 7 percent, down from the
13 percent rise originally anticipated, P&G said."

So add 7 percent to: Income available to common (ttm) $3.61B

That's on sales of: Sales (ttm) $39.2B.

As for WAVX, sure the upside to 70 thousand is going to be far easier to dramatically increase than P&G's $39.2B

The bottom line is, you and the rest of the mania traders are simply jumping on the bandwagon of what the herd is doing. And there is nothing wrong with that. Just don't try to claim that the "smokestack stocks" can't make the profits that techs can, because that's hogwash.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext