SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : PRESIDENT GEORGE W. BUSH

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: jlallen who wrote (14467)3/8/2000 10:03:00 AM
From: greenspirit  Read Replies (1) of 769667
 
That's great about your wife's recovery. Illnesses can really be a scary thing.

It seems logical that Bush should offer McCain the VP spot. And I agree the ultimate goal is the most important issue. With the mainstream media so completely aligning themselves with the liberal Democrats, the race is by no means assured.

Check this news article out...Looks like the "Vast Right wing conspiracy" has spread to California! <vbg>

Calif. Approves Gay Marriage Ban
Associated Press Online - March 08, 2000 09:19
By BOB EGELKO

Associated Press Writer

marketwatch.newsalert.com
SAN FRANCISCO (AP) - California, the land of change, voted for tradition, saying no to gay marriage.

After a campaign led and financed by religious conservatives, voters Tuesday approved Proposition 22, which prohibits California from granting marital rights to same-sex couples who are legally married in any other state.

No state allows same-sex marriages. But since the Hawaii Supreme Court raised the possibility of legalizing gay marriage in 1993, 31 states have passed pre-emptive laws denying recognition to same-sex couples legally married anywhere else. California is the third to adopt the law at the ballot box.

With 99 percent of precincts reporting, 4,158,823 people, or 61 percent, voted for the measure, and 2,617,004 people, or 39 percent, voted against.

Californians "like what has been going on for thousands of years," said GOP state Sen. Pete Knight, who qualified the initiative for the ballot after the Legislature rejected it. "California is not ready for marriage between a man and a man."

Knight's gay son, David, campaigned against the measure.

Exit polls conducted by Voter News Service for The Associated Press and TV networks found that the measure was supported about equally by men and women and by all races and income groups. It was opposed by young voters and by about two-thirds of Democrats, but Republicans backed it by 6-1.

No-on-22 Campaign manager Mike Marshall noted that Proposition 22 supporters stressed the simplicity of their 14-word text: "Only marriage between a man and a woman is valid and recognized in California."

Gay rights advocates have their own 14-word formula: "California's gay and lesbian families deserve the same legal protections as all married couples" - and will push to enact it through legislation, executive order or another ballot measure, Marshall said.

The mood was not as upbeat at Harvey's, a restaurant in San Francisco's heavily gay Castro district. It is named for the city's first openly gay supervisor, Harvey Milk, who was assassinated in 1978.

"What it's ensuring is that gay people will remain second-class citizens," said patron Gary Murphy, 39.

Supporters and opponents of the measure spent more than $13 million combined. Much of the money and most of the volunteers on the pro-22 side came from churches. Opponents included leaders of mainline Protestant churches and liberal denominations.

The pro-22 campaign disavowed any anti-gay motives, and said its goal was to let Californians define marriage for themselves.

In Vermont, the issue was on the table on town meetings around the state Tuesday. The decisions were meant to guide state lawmakers trying to craft legislation following a state Supreme Court ruling that gays are unconstitutionally being denied the benefits of marriage. One pending bill would grant all such benefits the state can offer without actually allowing gay marriages.

In all communities around the state that reported results, residents voted against allowing gay marriages, although it was close in a few. Several communities supported domestic partnerships, however.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext