Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: tejek who wrote (97458)	3/8/2000 5:04:00 PM
From: Process Boy	Read Replies (1) of 1571200

ted - <You show more candor in this post including the comments above than in any other I have seen you post since I have been with SI. Its very, very appreciated.> Hmph. I've tried to be candid all along. We were talking about stuff in the future, and still are. My previous comments are based on what each side has said publicly following the 1GHz announcements. AMD says April, Intel says Q3. I am assuming AMD is fairly confident of its ability to meet that commitment, or why else say it. On the other hand Intel could be sandbagging. I am just going to go by what each has publicly indicated, and in my case, given my bias, go ahead and give the worse case scenario for Intel. It's hard to argue April vs. Q3, unless events for some reason turn out differently. As of right now, today, 1GHz appears to be available in similar volumes from both Intel and AMD. PB

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next