Thor, I don't know if Chuca is still holding his gpgi shares,
but in the spirit of eyes wide open and walking the talk with that
which included identification of between the lines stuff so that later
it will not seem that I only told an 1/2 talk for a complete walk.
So, about 4 weeks ago I did a buy of 15,000 HABE shares so that after
us hurting shareholders regain control of this company we will instruct
the new management team to immediatly contact this company, and without
delay offer aJoining so that the Haber Gold Process can obtain a
cash flow for our and their company, in the exchanging gold for cash.
The extraction of the other precious metals of Global's dirt will then
proceed from the strength of an actual gold mining company with a cash
flow and strong valuation of stock price.
Not needed for I to speculate into this Haber Science company for
this event I outlined to happen, but it does add substance to thought.
Feb 25 - Company Update - Romanian Cyanida Spill & EMP Patent Protection
Haber, Inc. 470 Main Road, Towaco, NJ, USA
ph:(973) 263-0990
fx:(973) 263-9296
On January 30, 2000 there was a tragic cyanide spill at
the Baia Mare gold mine in northwestern Romania. It has been
referred to as Europe's worst environmental disaster since Chernobyl.
The polluted water flowed west into Hungary and then to Yugoslavia.
The poison destroyed virtually all aquatic life in the Tisa River
before entering the Danube, Serbian officials said. The Tisa is one of
the country's major rivers. Witnesses said parts of the Danube River were
"all white with the bellies of dead fish," the Beta news agency reported.
The Tisa River "has been killed. Not even bacteria have survived,"
Serbian Environment Minister Bratislav Blazic told The Associated Press
as he toured the affected area. Local volunteers were collecting dead
fish for burial in efforts to isolate some of the lethal substance.
Reports added that toxic heavy metals including lead and cadmium were
also discharged. The leaching of these elements often accompany the
cyanide extraction of gold from ores that contain these heavy metals.
Predrag Prolic, head of the Chemistry and Toxicology faculty at Belgrade
University, said it had "destroyed life in the Tisa for years to come."
Prolic added that beside aquatic life, birds feeding off fish and wildlife
are also at risk and the poisoned water can filter into the soil, grass,
grain and livestock.
The Haber Gold Process HGP could prevent catastrophes like this from happening.
Disasters like these are regrettable, but they do cause the public
to increase concerned about the dangers of cyanide. This can build
interest in our non-toxic alternative, the HGP. And that is good.
However, most of the attention has been merely reactive. Therefore,
the Company is not overly concerned with riding on the coattails of
the publicity surrounding unfortunate incidents like this for purposes
of self promotion. However, Haber has received some inquiries from the
media and mining companies because of the spill. Whether or not these
inquiries result in new business opportunities or media coverage,
we can not say. Our focus is on commercializing the HGP and letting
the benefits of the technology speak for itself.
EMP PATENT PROTECTION
The original patent protection for Electromolecular Propulsion (EMP)
has run out. Some shareholders have inquired whether further patent
protection is possible. Haber, Inc. had planned for this eventuality
from the time of the first patent filing.
The original patents were "process" patents. This means they were filed
to protect the fundamental technology by listing hundreds of different
chemicals that can be used in different combinations for EMP use.
The number of possibilities for combining these listed materials
are for practical purposes almost without a limit. This results
in only a trial and error empirical approach to creating an EMP
"protocol", which is comparable to a computer user's "software".
Haber's patent language did not explain any technical theory
that explains the fundamental principles which need to be used
as a guide to formulate reliable EMP protocols. The patent language
listed a few reproducible protocols of little commercial value
to demonstrate that the technology works.
Since EMP remains a completely proprietary technology to date,
our overall position at this stage is not to apply for more patents
prior to the commercial need to do so.
A manual was produced over the years that details how to develop protocols.
It is called the EMP Protocol Development Manual. This proprietary document
can be copyrighted as well. Additionally, each application protocol can be
patent protected. Haber, Inc. intends to apply for patents for every protocol
developed to date and henceforth.
Key to each application of EMP are the individual protocols.
The proprietary knowledge for facilitating EMP protocol development
essentially remains with the company. Haber, Inc. intends to "own"
the methodology for designing protocols (again, like software for a
computer) for a long time to come so it will be established well ahead
of the companies that will surely follow after the EMP Protocol Development
Manual patent expires (sometime after the year 2020).
This means protocols that are claimed to have been developed without this
manual will require evidence of the empirical research done to do this
for the patent application to be valid. It is unlikely that another scientist
will recreate what Norman Haber developed over twenty years any time soon.
Additionally, patents can be filed for the EMP instrumentation.
Each instrument, like the new EMP 2000 mentioned in the last update,
and the various cells that have been designed for EMP, can be patented.
Some of these cells are newly developed and have not been shown to the public.
Two EMP cells perform in a unique way and at very high speeds. There are also
micro preparatory and concentration devices (small-scale purification)
that perform unlike anything available today.
This Company Update contains forward-looking statements as defined by
the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. Forward-looking
statements include statements concerning plans, objectives, goals,
strategies, future events or performance and underlying assumptions,
and all statements that are other than statements of historical facts.
These statements are subject to uncertainties and risks including,
but not limited to, economic conditions, the impact of competition
and pricing, government regulation, and other risks. All such
forward-looking statements made by or on behalf of the Company are qualified.
The Company disclaims any obligation to update any forward-looking
statements to reflect events or circumstances after the date hereof. |
