Intel Corporation (INTC) Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Intel Corporation (INTC)

INTC 38.16

+2.5%

Nov 7 9:30 AM EST

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: Process Boy who wrote (100719)	3/12/2000 2:12:00 AM
From: nihil	Read Replies (1) of 186894

To defame someone in his business conduct is per se libel. That is, the plaintiff does not have to prove any damages to recover. The Times test does not apply, i.e. Intel is not a "public person" and actual malice need not be proved, although in this case it is self-evident. These words would also be interpreted as "unfair competition" in most states. Jerry was speaking as an official representation of AMD. The man is clearly nuts -- destroyed by hatred and malice. Intel should sue for libel and unfair competition. It should be able to collect huge damages. It can always use a couple more fabs.

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next