WDC/Sandisk Corporation Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : WDC/Sandisk Corporation

WDC 160.58

+2.2%

11:41 AM EST

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: Ausdauer who wrote (9724)	3/17/2000 10:06:00 PM
From: Craig Freeman	Read Replies (1) of 60323

Ausdauer, re: "Shouldn't we at least know at this point if the motions were carried or denied?" Uh, no. The trial may have proceeded or it may have been delayed. If it proceeded, the judge could have heard all of the issues, some of the issues, or only one. And the judge can take as long as the Judge wants before ruling on that point or points. The Judge can also decide that more evidence is required and set a new date to hear more evidence. Or, the Judge could have decided that donuts were more important than this suit and adjourn early to visit the local Winchells. Judges are not required to make any of this public until he/she decides to do so, if ever. For that matter, they can decide to table a suit indefinitely with no explanation whatsoever. The justice system only makes sense to the lawyers who created it. And most of them will tell you that they have yet to figure it all out either. Craig

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next