SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : First Virtual Corporation (FVCX)

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: tech101 who wrote (296)3/18/2000 10:10:00 AM
From: QuietWon  Read Replies (4) of 323
 
Manx, Carey, Youlu, All: Recent trading & thoughts

The fundamental story for vc has already been stated several times and I'll come back to that in a bit, but first a look at the technicals.

Technical analysis depends on your trading time horizon for a particular stock. If you look at a 3 month horizon, the charts show fvc is in a downfall with moneyflow being +ve $50million at the beginning of March and now basically Zero (ie a loss of $50 million money flow in the past 2 1/2 weeks). The on-balance volume shows basically the same pattern, though it is truncated a little earlier. The difference in these 2 measures is money flow is the $-flow whereas the OBV is just a share-flow, so the fact that the money flow is worse means that larger-than-average trades are sales.

The moving averages show FVC in a decline and if it crosses to the negative, we are in for a more of a negative period.
What would be needed to brake the downfall is some good news. However, we just had some good news this week (apprently good news) and on up-market days, yet FVC still went down.

This leads back to the fundamentals, I believe.

While the vc market should do well, it is a "peripheral" market in that it does not control its own fate and is dependent on other markets eg. internet infrastructure (backbone, connection/final mile) markets.

Additionally, FVC needs to be aware of other competing technologies. RVSN has been around for about 10 years, is part of a larger group (RAD), helped form the H.323 ITU standard, has its own MCU gateway, has over 250 customers , etc.
LOUD also went public.

Though the news for FVCX seemed good, it was overshadowed by other companies in the marketplace, I believe, and investment and trading dollars went to these other companies and may continue to do so - we need to be on the look out for this and take it into account in our own trading horizons.

biz.yahoo.com
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext