Jim,
Thanks for the retraction. I'd really like to keep this board civil. There's plenty of the other stuff over on Yahoo and even RB.
My point - which I think many of the shorts have missed, is that you could say the same stuff about almost any of the high tech, biotech, turn arounds and start-ups.
You really can't deny that.
In fact, read my posts to some of your associates. I took 5 minutes found a stock that each one was touting and found similar stuff -- convertibles, tough financing, losses, few sales, etc.
Take a look at some of the plays that are big --AVAN, CEGE, QTEK. These are by your standards real dogs that some of your associates are hyping.
I am not criticising those companies only trying to bring a sense of balance.
Is XYBR perfect or should it be more than a set percent of your holdings? Of course not.
However, the dis-information campaign began here, was not played fairly and is being investigated at the appropriate levels.
XYBR has INCREDIBLE POTENTIAL, UNIQUE CONTACTS AND ASSOCIATIONS with the likes of SONY, IBM, HP and others. These entities would not associate, even peripherally, with a scam or if there was not substance to the PATENTS.
Thank you.
rr |
