Sammim, first I did not write $330 next week, the closest was a question to Estephen if a $60 debacle in two weeks is so impossible (after a 4100 debacle this week).
The argument that posting numbers and opinions should apply to both bullish and bearish mumbling, if I would follow your suggestion, I'll have to be muzzled. How come no one attempted to muzzle me $300 lower? I had some arguments with some bears then (bears for which I hold a lot of respect), but there was no outcry as to my unfairness to the bears.
Last, as I have said when this stock was around $80, the bear is the bulls best friend, it provides support by covering on swoons down and provide a helluva of fuel to accentuate rallies on the way up.
I think we should listen and argue both side of this without entering into an endless series of argument about "agendas" etc.
Gee, I was long on two trip Thursday and long on one trip on Friday, but during those periods I did not change my current general opinion, we have come a long way and a retrenchment is not only possible and maybe probable, it is healthy.
Last, since you are new to this thread, you may not know that, but I do not sell short, I simply don't sleep well at night being short, and since I trade in my SEP account, even if my psychological make up allowed it, the government would not.
Zeev |
