<<How can you admire the persons environmental beliefs when you haven't even read his book?>>
You are putting word in my mouth. I admire the fact that the environment is on his radar screen at all. I don't believe it's even on Bush's radar screen--Bush does not "understand" the issue at all and would not balance anything--he is too much beholden to big business interests and pseudo-conservative ideologues who think that paving over the USA from sea to shining sea is progress.
<< So really what you've been saying is, I only dislike certain lobby groups. >>
No. I think the whole lobby system needs reform. Of course I have interests just like all individuals in a democracy. I would like to see lobbies wage open democratic battle for their interests and reduce the power of hidden MONEY to be the thing that talks most. I would like to see citizens vote less with their pocketbook and more with a real voice. I know you think that is pie-in-the-sky or unconstitutional. But I think McCain brought the subject of money corrupting the process up for debate and it deserves more attention than it gets. I really don't think the Founders wanted or expected congressmen to worry as much as they do about who is and is not giving them money. I think if the Founders could have imagined the expensive money/media-driven world we live in they would be dismayed, and dismayed by the central role money plays in politics today. I imagine that Jefferson and Madison would have disagreed on just what to do about it but I think they would both be dismayed. Fact is, the most cogent response George W. Bush has mounted against the idea of campaign finance reform is to say that it would hurt the Repubs more than the Dems. Gimmee a break.
On the environment, people sort themselves out into two broad categories: Take global warming, for example. There are those who say: until I see ironclad scientific proof it is a big problem, I'm not going to worry about it--unending economic growth is too important--even if their is a chance that by the time we have incontrovertible proof it will be too late to do anything about it anyway. The people in the other camp say: if this could be a big problem, and a lot of data suggests it may well be, then we owe it to future generations to err on the side of caution here and take it seriously, this is too important to just wait until it's too late to do anything about it. Of course, people fall out along a continuum, a spectrum between these two extremes. But I see the Republicans as too uninterested and too incautious. Too much in the one camp.
I like Gore's interest in the problems of unlimited development and suburban sprawl. I like the fact that he even has it on his radar screen, even brings it up. That's all. Doesn't mean I love Al. You like Bush's general drift--doesn't mean you love George. Read Asphalt Nation - How the Automobile Took Over America and How We Can Take it Back, by Jane Holtz Kay. (Random House, 1997) |
