SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : Rainier's Column

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: kjhwang who wrote (27)3/21/2000 12:52:00 AM
From: HeyRainier  Read Replies (1) of 106
 
Hi TCI,

You're absolutely right about the theoretical infinite return. I failed to mention, however, the nature of my intentions with the trade, which highlights the overall risk/reward tradeoff. In a private message to someone just recently, I wrote:

"...As for me, I've still tended to be a pure-equity guy. The only option ventures I've stepped into are shorting puts for the bullish effect. My most fun/un-fun play was with QCOM, when I wrote puts while the stock traded at $122. It promptly ran up 20 points within a few hours, locking me out of any upside gain.

I learned with that situation that I probably should have exposed myself to the pure equity, because had the underlying moved against me, I still would have likely covered the short put. Hence, my losses would have been comparable, but I locked myself out of any upside potential.

I made money in any case, and I suppose that's the best kind of situation where you want to be learning things from the market. 95% of the time, I'd usually have to be the one paying to learn these things..."

That's what I meant about my particular tradeoff. Given my exit strategy, my losses would have been comparable, but my returns would not have been.

Rainier

PS. Glad you could join us.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext