2oz au multiples,6.4oz au highs,again,again,again QIX ! Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : 2oz au multiples,6.4oz au highs,again,again,again QIX !

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: Chuca Marsh who wrote (5)	5/3/1997 8:10:00 AM
From: mike timoranszky	of 23

hi chuca , before creating this thread i ran a search for qix and came up empty , as for the title of this thread i like it just fine , its a truthfull reflection of its findings , exciting news is exciting and exciting in its self is not bad , this thread is not a hypsterism as it encourages dds and once the participant has complied the freedom of informed choice is thiers , the title of the old thread is boring as it simply identifies the co. for which a thread is available , with the hundreds or thousands ? of threads in s.i. many co.s threads simply go unnoticed , i spend an enormus amount of time exploring si looking for co.s , what am i looking for ? well , a co with potential so if i come across a thread with the promise of something exciting then i read it , perhaps i should include the name as well as the symbol ? well i don`t know if its nessesary , most searches include the symbol first and then the name and symbol and finnally just the name , inconclusion good old promotion is what its all about , which thread should prevail ? i`m sure that such an attitude is undisirable as it is unnessesary and possibly rude , however as long as there is freedom to express individual style as well as information on s.i. i`m hoping that this thread is as exciting as the co. that its about . thank you for your input and i hope that the participants on both threads realize that reading either thread is as easy as a click of a mouse so having two threads with different titles simply means more exposure , ________________SHOULD BE CHANGED_____________________ _____________this type of flaming may be intimidating to some but i simply think it`s rude ...... so DON`T FLAME ME !!!!! i simply don`t appreciate it! but alls well that developes in an expandingly profitable way eh ? thanks again for the important info that you posted for us "NEWBEES" in closing i`m sure that this thread will be visited by individuals who will understand full well the meaning and impact of the written word even if they are not flamed ! i m o anyway cheers mikey

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next