SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Rambus (RMBS) - Eagle or Penguin
RMBS 94.82+2.7%Nov 26 3:59 PM EST

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Jdaasoc who wrote (38722)3/23/2000 1:10:00 PM
From: Tenchusatsu  Read Replies (1) of 93625
 
John, <Most people think it is the double clocking that infringes RMBS's patent.>

I think this is a widely held misconception. If it's the double-clocking that infringes on the patents, then a lot of other interface standards would infringe on RMBS' patents as well, like AGP, Intel's Itanium bus, AMD's Athlon bus, Compaq/Digital's EV6 bus (actually the same as Athlon bus), etc.

<I believe DDR infringes by the fact it may mux it's control signals on the data bus. RMBS describes this feature on several of it's patents.>

I don't think either do this. As Dave already explained, Rambus has eight signals that are used as a dedicated control bus (three for row packets, five for column packets) along with 16 separate signals for data. DDR also has separate signals for control, I think. The difference is that Rambus double-pumps both control and data packets, while DDR only double-pumps data.

I'll try and find out more on my end, John.

Tenchusatsu
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext