SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Rambus (RMBS) - Eagle or Penguin
RMBS 87.54-4.0%2:07 PM EST

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Bilow who wrote (38792)3/23/2000 2:45:00 PM
From: jim kelley   of 93625
 
Bilow,

You seem to enjoy misleading people on this thread.
You say that Samsung knows RDRAM is dead and is preparing to produce DDR ram but you say they are keeping their intentions secret. So presumably only you know what they are doing. <LOL>

Second, you are comparing DDR component chips with RAMBUS RDRAM memory system chips. In order to do a proper comparison a memory system needs to be constructed out of those (vaporware) DDR DRAM components to include latches, ECC circuitry, etc. None of the RDRAM haters on this thread has ever done that! RDRAM has 288 bits because it incorporates error correction and detection on the chip. This has got to be a lot faster than a memory system using board level components.

Finally, you ignore the fact that RAMBUS has stated that the current generation of RDRAM is not targeted at big servers. It is intended for desktop, workstations, small servers and game stations. DDR is intended for large servers with memory >> 1 gigabyte.

RAMBUS has stated that DDR DRAM is not competing with RDRAM because they target different market segments. So your argument leads no where.

I can see that system anaylsis is not your strong suit!
If it was you would have made a 5 bagger like a lot of us on this thread.<G>

:)
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext