SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Non-Tech : The Critical Investing Workshop
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: crdesign who wrote (8992)3/24/2000 12:09:00 AM
From: RR  Read Replies (1) of 35685
 
Good question! Antarctica is claimed under treaty by multi-nations, so it is odd in itself. Then when that thing starts moving, one could argue it stretches the boundary lines, thus extending the economic zones, which effect fishing rights, etc. Can of worms..... I didn't pay attention to which national base it was near when it broke off. Gee, if it was a Russian base, wonder if they could claim sole ownership, put some missiles, or whatever, on that thing and float it around the south Atlantic awhile???
Bet South Africa would appreciate that thing rounding the Cape of Good Hope! All kinds of issues....hum.

Rick
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  

HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News