SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Microcap & Penny Stocks : ECNC (OTC:BB) - eConnect
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Ken O'Connor who wrote (7798)3/24/2000 10:42:00 AM
From: Erik Lundby  Read Replies (1) of 18222
 
The reason I am here is not because I have money to lose. I have never shorted ECNC. The reason I have hung around here is because of the story and the Fraud. You wagered once on a company accused of fraud and lost. If you wish to wager again on my motivations for being here I would be happy to oblige. Let me know and I will set it up. Do you wan't to back up your assertion that the only reason one would be here is because they have money on the line to lose? I came because I shorting oppportunity in a company in a company that was doing all kinds of hairy things. I did not get a short off in time before the halt. I stayed because I will see this story play out and find the behavior despiccable. Ken you said "You know very well that ECNC has NOT been proven of guilt, only charged, BIG BIG BIG difference DUDE." Ken there really is no big difference in this case. The SEC says they commited fraud. I know you you would rather believe the company than the SEC as the company has so much credibility. Maybe if you can come up one instance, (even one, surely there must be one, or will ECNC be the first) where the SEC has accused a company of fraud and it did not make a difference to stock price. You and others have implied that shorts should not be believed because they stand to gain financially. Well heres a shocker, so do company officials so you really should take them out of your list of credible sources if standing to gain makes someone unworthy of being listened to. Why don't you check with ex. employees, ex accountants, ex so called strategic alliance partners, the transfer agent. All these people are contactable and that is where DD should be done.

Erik
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  

HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News