SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Rambus (RMBS) - Eagle or Penguin
RMBS 105.01-5.1%Nov 11 3:59 PM EST

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: jim kelley who wrote (38900)3/24/2000 10:41:00 PM
From: Jdaasoc  Read Replies (4) of 93625
 
jim:
Read this UK article that talked about 3-4 GHz microprocessors. Do you think they will use 200 MHz core DDR DRAM. I doubt it. Time is on our side regarding the inevitability of RDRAM and it's successors making DDR non-competitive. I continually refer to Pat Gelsingser's IEEE keynote speech on SEP 28 - date of low stock point for 2nd half 99 59 3/4 - several times in the past. One tidbit of note is that processor speed and subsystem speeds, video, FSB and disk I/O will continually double every 12-24 months.

john

zdnet.co.uk

CeBIT 2000: Intel looks ahead to 4GHz chips


Fri, 25 Feb 2000 17:18:20 GMT

Will Knight


Higher speeds to fulfil users' Star Trek dreams

Intel has committed itself to more speed mania in the never-ending battle to get one up on rival AMD. The microprocessing giant has promised to raise the bar for processor clock speeds to 3GHz and 4GHz in the near future.

At the CeBIT technology show in Hannover, Germany, Intel's director of architecture, Gordon Graylish, said the chip giant is already looking into technology that could bring these sorts of dizzying speeds to the world of personal computing.

"It's not going to stop," says Graylish. "We can't see the next 10 years. We've just reached 1GHz, but we can see speeds of 3GHz and even 4GHz." Graylish refused to be drawn out on exactly when we might see these dizzying processor speeds, however.

He added that this is not speed for the sheer hell of it; the company has the practical needs of users in mind. "One thing we're not worried about is people needing [the speed]," he said. "What people want is Star Trek. They want to be able to talk to intelligent devices, and this takes performance."

One thing Graylish does concede, however, is that the gigahertz game is a superficial measurement of a chip company's real success. "[Clock speed is] a pretty bad measurement of a chip's overall performance," he admitted. "It is a bit like buying a car based on the size of its engine."

Intel may be in trouble, rival AMD is frontrunner with its 850 MHz Athlon. There's more, too. Go with Jesse Berst to AnchorDesk to read comment about what's next in desktop chips -- and what it means to you.

What do you think? Tell the Mailroom. And read what others have said.

For full coverage see ZDNet UK's CeBIT 2000 special.

Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext