Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: tejek who wrote (99880)	3/25/2000 3:27:00 PM
From: Mani1	of 1576160

Ted Re <<I thought Fab 25 was converting to cu as well but I can't tell you where I got that info although doesn't it make sense that it would be converted to copper ultimately....I mean, why would AMD maintain product lines that are inconsistent with each other?>> Fab 25 is not design for Copper, the contamination issue would be big. It will also take a huge investment to have it converted. Much more than it cost to convert from 0.25 to 0.18. I guess I would not be shocked if it was converted at 0.13, but I still doubt it. Re <<Does the fact that it is at 0.18 um mean that spitfires could be produced there?>> I am fairly certain that spitfire wafers have already been started at fab 25. Mani

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next