Rande Is . . . HOME Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : Rande Is . . . HOME

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: If only I'd held who wrote (22649)	3/28/2000 10:53:00 AM
From: Rande Is	Read Replies (1) of 57584

Thanks, If Only. . . still holding NATS. . .but with it falling way short my 3 month target, the 12-month target should be downgraded by a similar percentage. OLBs just never took off this year, like I had thought they would. . .and there is a chance they won't at all this year. . .especially with Banks now jumping into the brokerage business as quickly as they can. . . I still believe we will see a nice pop on the opening of NATS site and accompanying announcements. . .and it is still greatly undervalued in its sector. . .but I am not as hot on the OLB sector this year as I was when I wrote that analysis. So I would put NATS at $22 within 3 months, with a possible spike to about $54 anytime within the year. . . unless the takeover rumors come true. . .then we only get a slight premium from where we are. . .hoping rumor is untrue. . .as the stock is deserving of plenty more. . .especially when they get their online brokerage running nationwide. . .added to their strong financial position and their tiny float. I would also expect a split, should the stock reach the 20s or upon the opening of their website/brokerage to the general public. Any word out their on an advertising campaign? Rande Is

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next