Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: chic_hearne who wrote (100470)	3/28/2000 3:15:00 PM
From: that_crazy_doug	Read Replies (1) of 1572969

<< This is my point. I'd rather see $.75 this quarter followed by $1.00 next quarter, as opposed to seeing $1.00 this quarter followed by $.75 next quarter. Even though both quarters would total $1.75, I'd like to see the quarters keep getting bigger. I think wall street would pay attention more if AMD went this route. You can only get so creative in your accounting though. >> I agree, but I think AMD is more likely to get $1.50 in Q2 if they get $1 in Q1 than the reverse. Once Thunderbirds and Spitfires come in socket packages instead of slot packages, I'd expect costs to decrease. Unless Intel gets a large quantity of 1 ghz P3s from somewhere, I'd expect AMD to push the sweet spot up even higher, and have significantly increased earnings.

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next