Buckey:
I really like the placing of our new comer, and the mention of having the diabase among their claims.
We have officially announced: Aqi, Meo, Mmin, and two that aren't proven, so I don't feel comfortable posting them, and of course Pfn. I will also say further down, we also have Flag and sister company Glb, and now that this is an area play (finally), that the stakes have changed somewhat. More DD will have to be done on my part. There are many others also, and anyone that would like to post them, please do.
I have just spent an hour with a geologist with 37 years of experience, and should add that most of this experience and still, is a project geologist of a well known company, and I have known him for years and he tells it straight up. I want to add that this gentleman has no connections to or anywhere around the Sudbury Area, he based his opinion on the News Release by Pfn this evening.
He was very pleased. Surprised at somepoints how consistent the numbers were. He feels this is the beginning of a major play. I asked him about the nickel and copper numbers, as we need these elements for pge tonnage. He said they are bi products they are fine, pfn has proven the richness of the pgms. The speculation of Pfn's River Valley Project has been proven, the numbers are too consistent, and continuous in each hole. He tells me that their job now will be to prove up tonnage, because G, these are mineable. Coming from him, it has all been confirmed. |
