SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Dan3 who wrote (100774)3/29/2000 11:18:00 PM
From: Paul Engel  Read Replies (1) of 1571808
 
AlibiDan - re: "Are you saying that X-Box will be produced on full depreciated .25 equipment in fully depreciated .25 FABs? (the reported speeds do seem to suggest that)."

No - 0.25 micron parts are today obsolete.

If Intel uses a 0.18 micron Coppermine or Timna for XBOX production in 2002, that will be the fourth year of 0.18 micron production (1999, 2000, 2001, 2002) so 80% of the equipment will be depreciated by then.

More than likely, Intel eventually transition the XBOX CPU to a 0.13 micron process for die size reduction - some time in mid to late 2002.

Beyond that, 300 mm wafer production will commence, further contributing to XBOX CPU cost reduction.

My estimate is that the XBOX CPU will - in production mode - cost Intel no more that $10 - $15 to produce.

Re: "Now, consider that to get Microsoft to shaft AMD in the middle of Intel's big "let's all switch to Linux" campaign, Intel must have offered a very low price - my guess is considerably under $20 - so the estimate that Intel will be shipping a $20 bill with each X-Box CPU sounds about right, and is probably a worthwhile investment for Intel."

Microsoft didn't SHAFT AMD - AMD LOST the bid to Intel.

Get over it.

Intel's costs are lower MUCH LOWER than AMD's.

Intel's CPU heat dissipation is LOWER - enabling LOWER COST gaming systems.

Intel's CPU is faster - read every friggin' benchmark test that has been published.

Intel's SSE extensions are superior to AMD's 3DNOW_DEAD.

Paul
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext