Hi Tero,
To support what Mr.Knight posted (not that he needs my support), if you are going to make statements about what the C,E.O. of Qualcomm is on record as having said, please site the source. Statements attributable to others need to be verifiable. Only by checking the source material can we verify the accuracy and context of your statement.
On a totally different subject. A recent S.S.B. report made this point, "QUALCOMM, THE HIDDEN AND THE BIGGEST BENEFICIARY OF ALL 3G NETWORKS
A less obvious, but probably the biggest winner in 3G, is Qualcomm
because it will collect royalties from every company that plans to
manufacture and sell of 3G infrastructure and subscriber equipment based
on CDMA technology whether it's CDMA2000 that has its roots in the United
States or W-CDMA that has its roots in Europe"
Tero, what is your take on W-CDMA IPR. Will NOK need a license from QCOM to manufacture W-CDMA equipment?? We are coming down to the wire. Can W-CDMA happen without paying royalties to QCOM?
Come on Tero, take a stand, it's what you do for a living. I think.
Thanks again
Pete
|
