SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Gold/Mining/Energy : SRU-ASE : STARFIELD RESOURCES
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: CIMA who wrote ()3/31/2000 12:28:00 PM
From: winston.s.c  Read Replies (1) of 1239
 
Firstly, the true width of mineralization is considerably less than many think. For example, hole RV-01 indicates 61.9m but then states mineralization was "intersected between 22-60m" which is 38m overall. The same applies with all holes as they were drilled at a 45 degree angle. Bottom line, true thickness is probably about 50% of that given per hole. We will know better when and if geological sections for each hole are published by PFN.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  

HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News