SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Gold/Mining/Energy : Pacific North West Capital Corporation-PFN on Alberta
PFN 7.470+0.7%Jan 8 4:00 PM EST

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Ptaskmaster who wrote (878)3/31/2000 12:39:00 PM
From: RJ2  Read Replies (2) of 2255
 
After reading yesterdays write up in the National Post I became confused on what ptaskmaster had said, "who cares about the gold and wanted to know if the Rhodium content was high". This gets to one basic question, when the RV-02 hole was described, was the 3.6 metre section of rock that contained 6.78 grams per tonne of PGM metals, would this include the gold content of the rock which would throw the whole result into question?? Gold is a lesser metal in this instance opposed to the the white rare earth metals and I would ask that if this is the standard for measurement under these circumstances would PFN management please correct this form of assay deception!! You just can't ball all the metals up into one number and let it ride!! I appreciate the action but these questions need to be asked at the point in time!!lol
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext