Flag Resources (FGR.A A) Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : Flag Resources (FGR.A A)

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: Just G who wrote (2897)	3/31/2000 1:04:00 PM
From: RJ2	Read Replies (2) of 4269

I feel some of the investors on the runup on the PFN have been deceived, the results from thier RV-02 hole that states there is 3.6 metres of 6.78 grams per ton of PGM has been described out of context. Does this assay contain gold as the filler to obtain the the designated number, who knows, but it would be nice if they didn't ball up the yellow metal with the rare earth, white stuff!! The write up in the National Post was nothing more than a quick splash job that needs to be refined before the true numbers are known, my thoughts only!! I got this feeling about this deception after reading Ptaskmaster saying in message 878 on the PFN chat group, " who cares about the gold content, I'd like to know the Rhodium content" it kind of got the old brain cells motoring and I think the this question deserves a proper anwser!!! What do you people think??

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next