Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: Elmer who wrote (101400)	4/1/2000 1:52:00 AM
From: pgerassi	Read Replies (2) of 1572172

Dear Elmer: None of those were on a BX chipset using 4.0 with 256MB PC100. They were also using what appears to be a 840 with Dual RMBS PC800 DIMMS. SPECbaseFP uses SPEC Specified switches. They seem to have been allowed more latitude than what I thought should be allowed given what I read at their site. Peak is allowed to have different switches per section. None of those runs use a non Intel FORTRAN compiler. Here is a page for a 600MHZ Pentium III BX PC100 v2.4 spec.org If you use a 4/3 ratio to est 800 MHZ BX you get 19.8 95basefp An Athlon 600 MHZ 751 PC100 V2.4: spec.org So the page shown by AMD does not seem impossible given the platform and compiler. All the ones you show use later compiler and Rambus with (840) (Dell, Compaq, and Siemens do not say which chipset). Pete

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next