SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : How high will Microsoft fly?
MSFT 486.87-1.4%3:56 PM EST

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: saukriver who wrote (40236)4/1/2000 11:47:00 AM
From: SC  Read Replies (2) of 74651
 
It's been fairly obvious, from the beginning of the trial, that Microsoft expected the judge to side with the plaintiffs. They knew that they didn't have a snowballs chance in hell in front of the judge selected to try the case. Microsoft entered every conceivable argument into the record so that they would have as many avenues as possible to get the judges verdict overturned on appeal. If the verdict is overturned on appeal the judges findings are null and void and Res Judicata would no longer apply. It is my opinion that microsoft would like to settle on terms that are acceptable to both sides. If they can't get terms that are acceptable to them they are fully prepared to take the case to the appellate court where they have a better chance of getting the case dismissed, sent back for re-trial, or possibly sent back to a lower court with explicit instructions as to what the appeals court wants in the way of changes in the rulings made during the trial. The real question is what are microsofts chances on appeal.

Steve
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext