SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : Gorilla and King Portfolio Candidates
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: tinkershaw who wrote (21960)4/1/2000 12:57:00 PM
From: 100cfm  Read Replies (1) of 54805
 
. Buying Q at the top is not much less risky on a price volatility stand point than was buying ABGX at its recent top (Q, using $105 was 47.5% off of its high, ABGX currently is 66%). Reference to price volatility is a red herring. And whether Q fell 55% or 47.5% the point is the same.

Tinker I disagree, the beauty of the gorilla game is not that our beloved gorillas are immune from 40 to 50% corrections, it is that they are immune from staying there, as is not the case for the majority of bios and other non gorillas. Therefore even buying at the top as you call it, is less risky since it has historically always proved to be only temporary.

100
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  

HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News