SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Rambus (RMBS) - Eagle or Penguin
RMBS 92.36-9.6%Nov 13 3:59 PM EST

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: mishedlo who wrote (39122)4/2/2000 4:31:00 PM
From: jim kelley  Read Replies (1) of 93625
 
Re: Tom's Hardware

Any claim to objectivity on the part of Tom, has been dismissed by the publication of Sheri Garber's RDRAM forecast (.1% marketshare) without any critical discussion of the huge gap between her forecast and Dataquest and Insite's forecast of 60% marketshare.

By the way, I ran some Quake tests on my DELL twin 733MHZ processor 840 motherboard workstation with 512 MB of dual channel RAMBUS and it was very impressive.

It ran a single copy of Quake in 72 seconds. Processor loading was about 50%. With two copies of quake running the execution times on the demo's was still 72 seconds. I ran 5 copies of the quake demo without any apparent degradation in execution time. There seems to be no apparent memory interference. This times are about 10% better than those reported for the 820 single channel motherboard (80 seconds).

I believe that the tests that are currently being used to measure RDRAM speed improvements are not actually even stressing the RDRAM. As processor speeds move above 1 GHZ we can expect RDRAM to begin to make clear its superiority.
It should also be possible to tune software applications to take even more advantage of RDRAM versus DRAM.

:)
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext