>You seem, as usual, to have missed the data points.
You seem, as usual, to be full of crap.
You claim that the "proof" that tom's hardware is biased against RDRAM is that intel, the major financial backer of Rambus, says the RDRAM is forcast (by Intel) to reach 50% market penetration at some time in the near future?
Were you smoking ganga when you posted that?
You know, O.J. Simpson will tell you that he's 100% not guilty of murder. Just ask him! We don't need no stinking "evidence" and "witnesses" and "conflicting defendant statements" and all those "facts".
And as for your fancy new quake setup, why don't you take the OH SO SIMPLE effort to run those tests again, in your exact same setup, but remove the RDRAM and replace it with pc-133 SDRAM.
But of course you wouldn't want to do that, because then you'd find the performance difference is less than 1%. And of course you just spent around 4000 dollars on your RDRAM, instead of 500 for the equivalent SDRAM. I can understand why you wouldnt want to do any tests that might show you just wasted $3500.
Yeah, tell us some more about how everyone is biased. |
