levy~  If this isn't Frigin A News, I don't know what is....re: MSFT
  I wish there were a national poll site (where we could trust the pollster) that would register our thoughts about this incredible decision.....Someday, we will know just how much our government HAS SPENT, and continues to SPEND on this lawsuit at all levels, and it would be my hope that the American people arise, and finally take some interest in what is happening in our government.  Maybe some of the folks will want to re-read Atlas Shrugged again...or maybe for the first time!  
  Another thought....if in fact the government can made this decision, what would stop anyone/company from getting information from any other competitor...ie. the drug manufacturers....if one makes a successful drug, can another drug company have access to it by filing an anti-trust lawsuit???  Or any software manufacturer?  Or any law firm in business....can they file a suit and demand access to another law firm's files.....RIGHT???!!! KLP
  go2net.com
  Judge Finds Microsoft Broke Antitrust Law
                      By David Lawsky Apr 3 6:00pm ET
                      WASHINGTON (Reuters) - A federal judge ruled Monday that Microsoft Corp. (MSFT.O) broke U.S.                     antitrust law by abusing its monopoly in personal computer operating systems.
                      District Court Judge Thomas Penfield Jackson said Microsoft violated key parts of the Sherman Act on                     three of the four main allegations leveled by the Justice Department and 19 states.
                      ``The court concludes that Microsoft maintained its monopoly power by anticompetitive means and                     attempted to monopolize the Web browser market,' Jackson wrote in a 43-page ruling.
                      The finding is expected to lead to consideration of penalties to prevent future violations, remedies that                     could include breakup of the software giant.
                      ``Microsoft's anticompetitive actions trammeled the competitive process through which the computer                     software industry generally stimulates innovations and conduces to the optimum benefit of consumers,'                     said Jackson.
                      Microsoft promised to appeal Jackson's ruling and said it believed the legal system would ultimately rule                     in its favor.
                      The company's stock, off sharply for the entire day as investors awaited Jackson's ruling, was halted just                     prior to the release of the findings. The shares resumed trading at 17:44, are were trading at $90-7/8.                     down $15-3/8.
                      In findings of fact issued in November last year, Jackson had already found that Microsoft's behavior hurt                     consumers, computer makers and other companies .
                      Settlement efforts in the case collapsed Saturday when a mediator said he could not bridge wide                     differences between the parties after four months of effort.
                      While it is legal to gain a monopoly through skill or luck, it is illegal to use that power to perpetuate a                     monopoly by preventing competitors from springing up.
                      Jackson also found that Microsoft tied its Internet Explorer software to its Windows operating system to                     exclude Netscape's rival product.
                      But he declined to find that Microsoft's marketing arrangements with computer makers and others                     amounted to illegal denial of marketing methods to Netscape, which has become a part of America                     Online Inc. (AOL.N) since the trial began nearly 18 months ago.
                      Justice Department antitrust chief Joel Klein praised the ruling. ``The decision will benefit consumers and                     stimulate competition and innovation in the high-tech industry,' Klein said in a statement. |