WC Spaulding, with all due respect for you personally, why don't you just give up on your analysis of the supposed "predatory pricing" of MS-Office. The facts are, Microsoft has always had a hefty price on their applications, all the way back since Excel spreadsheet competed against Borland's Quattro spreadsheet. All the way up until the present time, the PC OEMs could always get the WordPerfect Suite and its predecessors cheaper than MS-Office, to bundle onto their PCs that they sell.
re "you will see that my invoice listed MS Office separately, and that the price was zero."
Ms. Spaulding, I'm not getting through to you here. The price on your invoice has NOTHING to do with what Gateway paid MSFT for it. You bought a SYSTEM that came with COMPONENTS from MANY DIFFERENT MFRS, and that SYSTEM was put together by GATEWAY, and sold to you for ONE PRICE.
re "There is no question that Microsoft used its influence to distribute MS Office, and if OEMs passed the cost to the customer without telling them about it, then that's even worse than giving it away!"
No, you're wrong! You knew full well that your Gateway system was shipping to you with MS-Office. Furthermore, most people WANT an applications suite bundled WITH a new system, because THEY KNOW that they are getting it cheaper that way, than buying it at full retail price.
Microsoft distributed MS Office through OEMs to make money on volume sales, period. If you're going to place blame on someone, how about including Dell and Gateway, for entering into the distribution agreements? Corel WordPerfect and its predecessors were always there, but the OEMs kept choosing Microsoft. I don't like that either, but unless Microsoft forced the OEMs to enter into that arrangement, I don't think it was illegal.
FYI, I use and prefer WordPerfect also, and in fact my latest computer from Quantex came preloaded with Corel WordPerfect Suite 2000, and it's a great product. Unfortunately, the Dept of Justice doesn't give a hoot about Corel, and MS's exclusionary pricing wrt squeezing out Corel. Corel is a Canadian company, see? The only thing the DOJ cares about is Netscape, now owned by AOL.
You many not like it, and I may not like it, but this lawsuit is all about retribution against Microsoft, all because MS gave away Internet Explorer, causing Netscape's inflated stock to fall back to earth. Probably Thomas Penfield Jackson owned shares in Netscape and got burned when the stock fell from the 80s down to the 30s. Or because Larry Ellison, Scott McNealy, and/or Oracle and Sun gave substantial campaign contributions to the "right" people, people who have influence in Washington DC. We'll never know for sure. What we do know is that consumers aren't going to be helpd a darn bit by this circus, regardless of what Ms. Reno says on the evening news.
Regards,
DK |
