SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : How high will Microsoft fly?
MSFT 510.89+0.4%3:55 PM EST

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Dwight E. Karlsen who wrote (41187)4/5/2000 2:22:00 AM
From: William C. Spaulding  Read Replies (1) of 74651
 
Thank you for your input. I know that the present lawsuit doesn't really deal with MS Office, but they're basically using the same technique. That's why I wrote the article that I did. Because with MS Office, Microsoft clearly succeeded in using predatory pricing to establish its MS Office monopoly, and, unlike the browser lawsuit, Microsoft has definitely recouped its costs, satisfying the 2 legal requirements for predatory pricing. And I think this case would be much easier to prove, since the evidence is strong and clear. I always wondered why IBM or Corel don't sue, or even ask the DOJ to investigate it. A lawsuit in this area might be worth billions to Corel, which really needs the money. Although I'm not a lawyer, it would seem that this case would be far stronger and easier to prove than the current lawsuit focused on the browsers.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext