SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : MDA - Market Direction Analysis
SPY 665.67-0.9%4:00 PM EST

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Dave Shares who wrote (45204)4/6/2000 11:50:00 AM
From: Zeev Hed  Read Replies (1) of 99985
 
David another three major differences between now and 1929 is that then, margin requirements were 10%(check this one, since I see some people are saying margins were at 40%, the mandated margin, I believe was much lower), for the fully margined, a 10% decline was a catastrophe. A second difference, the flattening of the economy followed by the crash produced a contraction of the economy with major contraction of final demand, today we have a cushion to end demand through the "security blanket". A third difference is that money is now being "created" on a world wide basis, then the feds stood aside on the monetary front, now they have shown time and again that they will bring in the "crash brigades" to avoid major disruptions in the financial markets.

Last but not least, another parallel, the government was running budget suprluses before the decline, this mean that money was being drained from the economy. Contrary to widely held opinions, surpluses are not good for the market. Balanced budgets or just marginal surpluses seems to be ideal.

Zeev
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext