WDC/Sandisk Corporation Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : WDC/Sandisk Corporation

WDC 163.00

-0.4%

3:59 PM EST

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: Ausdauer who wrote (10207)	4/7/2000 5:17:00 PM
From: Michael A. Gottesman	Read Replies (3) of 60323

Another victory! Don't know the particulars of the motion, but it seems like another victory for SanDisk: From the court docket - ORDER by Mag. Judge Phyllis J. Hamilton denying defendant's motion to compel plaintiff to provide an adequate response to Lexar's Interrogatory No. 4 [223-1] (Date Entered: 4/6/00) (cc: all counsel) [3:98-cv-01115] Go SanDisk Mike OT - Aus, don't worry to much about insulting Paterson. I live about 5 miles away and I remember when I was a kid, there was a town called East Paterson and it was just East of the City of Paterson. Well, they didn't want to be associated with Paterson so they changed their name to Elmwood Park. They used the same initials so they didn't have to change the sewer covers in the road which were stamped with the letters "EP." I always thought it would be great if Paterson then changed its name to West Elmwood Park, but it never happened. LOL

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next