SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Rambus (RMBS) - Eagle or Penguin
RMBS 107.76+1.2%Nov 7 9:30 AM EST

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: jim kelley who wrote (39447)4/9/2000 1:00:00 PM
From: Scumbria  Read Replies (1) of 93625
 
Jim,

Odd isn't it that the major planned uses of DDR are for graphics while the planned uses of RDRAM are for motherboards? Looks like the engineering community thinks has views opposite yours. Does that bother you at all?

Intel made a serious strategic mistake picking DRDRAM. I'm not sure that it is fair to blame it on engineering.

If the cost was lower, graphics cards would use DRDRAM. There have been several graphics designs which require multiple high bandwidth channels, for which DRDRAM would be a good engineering solution.

Network cards (like Sitera) also can enjoy the same advantages from DRDRAM that graphics cards can. This is because they require multiple channels, and are bandwidth limited rather than latency limited.

I wonder why Sony is not using DDR in PS2?

DRDRAM is a good choice for PS2, for the reasons I outlined above. I suspect that Sony is getting a very good price for their DRDRAM, in order to generate publicity and keep the product alive.

Scumbria
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext