SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Rambus (RMBS) - Eagle or Penguin
RMBS 95.53+0.7%12:59 PM EST

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Bilow who wrote (39439)4/9/2000 6:22:00 PM
From: Jdaasoc  Read Replies (1) of 93625
 
Hi bilow; I took another look at Samsung's RIMM/DIMM
offerings

144 MB RDRAM chip in mass production; makes 64-256 MB RIMMs by simple addition of chips to RIMM. There is only one type of design for RDRAM channel

288 Mb RDRAM chip soon to be in mass production; makes 128 to 512 MB RIMMs by simple addition of chips to RIMM. Still, there is only one type of design for RDRAM channel.

xxyy Mb RDRAM chip soon to be in mass production in future; makes xxyy/2 to xxyy*2 MB RIMMs by simple addition of chips to RIMM. Still, there is only one type of design for RDRAM channel.

DDR being a 64 bit wide hi speed memory arch. the industry has to decide how to:
1.) - make it work at greater than 133 MHz
2.) - how to design 64 bit memory system with DDR DIMM;s with capacities less than 1GB using 256 Mb chips. As you pointed out much greater than 1 DDR chip design is in consideration/evaluation.

Great idea for servers bad idea for desktops.

As John W. has pointed clearly pointed out memory manufacturers will hate making all those DDR memory varients.

There is really no reason to respond to you again. The last time I said that RMBS was at about 70 last fall. I am getting that feeling that last weeks action and your recurring nonsense is precusor to higher prices in the coming months.

john
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext