SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : Portfolio Protection + Money Management for the Long Term

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Tom Trader who wrote (20)4/9/2000 7:20:00 PM
From: BDR  Read Replies (2) of 57
 
Good points all. No, one need not have puts or other forms of protection in place at all times. Using the example of QQQ puts that I gave would cost about 1% of the value of the portfolio per month. But, if you don't always have something in place, we get back to the timing issue. Recently I happened to start looking for protection just as my portfolio hit its high (early March) but I can't claim to always be that prescient.

Puts on specific stocks could be used. Would they be more or less expensive than puts on an index? I would think more. Feasibility of doing so would depend on the size of your holdings and the commission schedule you are dealing with. Using the betas of the individual holdings would allow one to adjust the portfolio's capitalization that would need to be protected and still buy only an index put. I am still trying to figure out how to get that information about stocks' beta or volatility to make the calculation.

I am glad you brought up the subject of covered calls. I had not discussed that possibility because I was trying to keep thing simple, but that would be a logical way to offset the cost of puts.

By the way, Larry McMillan has a website: optionstrategist.com
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext